BG-23VAT breakdownBT-116VAT category taxable amountBT-117VAT category tax amountBT-118VAT category codeBT-119VAT category rate
Official rule text
[BR-S-09] The VAT category tax amount (BT-117) in a VAT breakdown (BG-23) where VAT category code (BT-118) is "Standard rated" shall equal the VAT category taxable amount (BT-116) multiplied by the VAT category rate (BT-119).
Why this error occurs
In a standard-rate breakdown (category S) the VAT amount (BT-117) must equal the taxable amount (BT-116) multiplied by the rate (BT-119); the schematron allows a deviation of less than 1.00 to tolerate per-line rounding. The rule reads cac:TaxSubtotal/cbc:TaxAmount, cbc:TaxableAmount and cac:TaxCategory/cbc:Percent (UBL) or ram:CalculatedAmount, ram:BasisAmount and ram:RateApplicablePercent (CII). It fails when the rate is given as 0.19, when the tax was computed on a different base than the one written, or when the amount was copied from a PDF with a different rounding.
How to fix it
Formula: BT-117 = round(BT-116 x BT-119 / 100, 2), with the rate as a percentage number (19, 7). Compute the tax from the exact cbc:TaxableAmount / ram:BasisAmount written into the XML. If your system computes VAT per line and sums it, the result is within tolerance, but the totals must still be consistent with BR-CO-14 and BR-CO-15. Keep one subtotal per rate.
Example (valid)
<cac:TaxSubtotal>
<cbc:TaxableAmount currencyID="EUR">100.00</cbc:TaxableAmount>
<cbc:TaxAmount currencyID="EUR">19.00</cbc:TaxAmount>
<cac:TaxCategory><cbc:ID>S</cbc:ID><cbc:Percent>19</cbc:Percent><cac:TaxScheme><cbc:ID>VAT</cbc:ID></cac:TaxScheme></cac:TaxCategory>
</cac:TaxSubtotal>
What the validator checks
Checked element (context):
UBL
/*/cac:TaxTotal/cac:TaxSubtotal/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID) = 'S'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']Test (XPath):
(abs(xs:decimal(../cbc:TaxAmount)) - 1 < round((abs(xs:decimal(../cbc:TaxableAmount)) * (xs:decimal(cbc:Percent) div 100)) * 10 * 10) div 100 ) and (abs(xs:decimal(../cbc:TaxAmount)) + 1 > round((abs(xs:decimal(../cbc:TaxableAmount)) * (xs:decimal(cbc:Percent) div 100)) * 10 * 10) div 100 )CII
//ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax/ram:CategoryCode[.='S']Test (XPath):
(abs(xs:decimal(../ram:CalculatedAmount)) - 1 < round(abs(xs:decimal(../ram:BasisAmount)) * ../ram:RateApplicablePercent) div 100 ) and (abs(xs:decimal(../ram:CalculatedAmount)) + 1 > round(abs(xs:decimal(../ram:BasisAmount)) * ../ram:RateApplicablePercent) div 100 )
Check your invoice
Drop your XML or PDF on the validator and every failed rule is linked to its page here. Free, no account, the file is not stored.
Same check via API:
curl -F file=@invoice.xml https://einvoicechecker.com/v1/validateRelated rules
BR-AF-09The VAT category tax amount in a VAT breakdown where VAT category code is "IGIC" shall…BR-AG-09The VAT category tax amount in a VAT breakdown where VAT category code is "IPSI" shall…BR-S-08Standard-rate taxable amount (BT-116) does not match the linesBR-AF-08For each different value of VAT category rate where the VAT category code is "IGIC",…BR-AG-08For each different value of VAT category rate where the VAT category code is "IPSI",…BR-AE-08In a VAT breakdown where the VAT category code is "Reverse charge" the VAT category…BR-AE-09The VAT category tax amount in a VAT breakdown where the VAT category code is "Reverse…BR-CO-17VAT category tax amount (BT-117) does not match base times rate
Frequently asked questions
What does BR-S-09 mean?
BR-S-09 is a en 16931 core rule: The VAT category tax amount (BT-117) in a VAT breakdown (BG-23) where VAT category code (BT-118) is "Standard rated" shall equal the VAT category taxable amount (BT-116) multiplied by the VAT category rate (BT-119).
Will my invoice be rejected because of BR-S-09?
Yes. BR-S-09 is flagged "fatal"; validators (KoSIT, Peppol access points, the German ZRE/OZG-RE portals) reject the invoice until it is fixed.
Which formats does BR-S-09 apply to?
Every EN 16931 invoice: XRechnung, ZUGFeRD 2.x / Factur-X (profiles EN 16931, EXTENDED, XRECHNUNG), Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, and national CIUS such as the Dutch NLCIUS or the Italian/Spanish profiles. Syntax: UBL and CII.
Source: EN 16931-1:2017 schematron (CEN TC434, via Peppol BIS 3.0.20). Catalogue generated from the official schematron on 2026-10-14.